MH17: Preliminary Report
The Dutch Safety Board investigating the downing of Malaysian Airlines MH17 in Ukraine released its Preliminary Report earlier today.
The report states that the plane was hit by high velocity projectiles that struck the cockpit destroying the structural integrity of the plane and causing it to plummet to the ground. There are no signs of any mechanical failure or pilot error.
Page 25 figure 10 of the report indicates that the projectiles that punctured the plane came from above the cockpit floor
There is no damage to the bottom or the body of the plane's fuselage.
Photographs not listed in the DSB board shows gauges to the top of the left wing that align up with the plane's cockpit
Whilst the report avoided making any definitive accusations or statements to the cause of the planes demise they did not rule in or out the possibility of an air to air attack,
Russian radar recorded at the time of the incident shows that there was at least one Ukrainian Fighter jet trailing flight MH17. This is backed up by eyewitness accounts from people on the ground
The DSB report does not rule in or out the Ground to Air BUK missile attack but there has neither been any explanation as to how a BUK can cause the damage recorded to the cockpit and the top of the planes wing. The attack had to come from above the cockpits floor.
The only way to know for sure is to collect the wreckage of the plane and reconstruct the cockpit area and determine exactly the angle of projection of the penetration holes that struck the plane,
The DSB has said that it needs to undertake closer examination of the planes wreckage to do more testing before it brings down its final report expected before July 2015
With the ceasefire in place in Eastern Ukraine recovery of the wreckage should be possible provided the Ukrainian Government does not get there first.
The BUK scenario
The report states that the plane was hit by high velocity projectiles that struck the cockpit destroying the structural integrity of the plane and causing it to plummet to the ground. There are no signs of any mechanical failure or pilot error.
Page 25 figure 10 of the report indicates that the projectiles that punctured the plane came from above the cockpit floor
There is no damage to the bottom or the body of the plane's fuselage.
Photographs not listed in the DSB board shows gauges to the top of the left wing that align up with the plane's cockpit
Whilst the report avoided making any definitive accusations or statements to the cause of the planes demise they did not rule in or out the possibility of an air to air attack,
Russian radar recorded at the time of the incident shows that there was at least one Ukrainian Fighter jet trailing flight MH17. This is backed up by eyewitness accounts from people on the ground
The DSB report does not rule in or out the Ground to Air BUK missile attack but there has neither been any explanation as to how a BUK can cause the damage recorded to the cockpit and the top of the planes wing. The attack had to come from above the cockpits floor.
In the absence of this information there is only one scenario that fits the bill based on the known facts already
#MH17 Facts
1. Only cockpit attacked.
2. Came from above cockpit floor
3. Gauges on top of wing
4. No damage underneath or to body of plane
5. Russian radar and eyewitness reports show Ukrainian fighter Jets trailing light MH17 at time of the incident
— UkrToday (@UkrToday) September 9, 2014
The only way to know for sure is to collect the wreckage of the plane and reconstruct the cockpit area and determine exactly the angle of projection of the penetration holes that struck the plane,
The DSB has said that it needs to undertake closer examination of the planes wreckage to do more testing before it brings down its final report expected before July 2015
With the ceasefire in place in Eastern Ukraine recovery of the wreckage should be possible provided the Ukrainian Government does not get there first.
The BUK scenario
Take a model plane and a fenarik or group of lasers pointers and shine it on the cockpit to determine the angle of penetration #MH17
— UkrToday (@UkrToday) September 10, 2014
Factual Guidelines #MH17 Only the front left part of the cockpit can be in light. Must be above the height of the cockpit floor, not on body
— UkrToday (@UkrToday) September 10, 2014
Having determined the angle of attack determine the angle of projection of a missile's flight in relation to #MH17 last location to match
— UkrToday (@UkrToday) September 10, 2014
A BUK has two stage firing. It sends a shock wave & a ring of projectiles that would travel in a straight line from point of explosion #MH17
— UkrToday (@UkrToday) September 10, 2014
Point of explosion has to be above the height of the plane c/pit. The flight path of a BUK missile would be known by military experts #MH17
— UkrToday (@UkrToday) September 10, 2014
The telling fact is that the explosion projectile did not damage the body of fuselage. Shock wave could have. #MH17 http://t.co/oRNhfSjn9H
— UkrToday (@UkrToday) September 10, 2014
Comments