Results and Analysis of Seat Allocation

as of 12PM Wednesday March 29: Two Methods listed

By Online Editor -
There is some confusion as to if the initial 3% threshold in the seat allocation is included.  I previously included the 3% on my calculations but when I read the article on Wikipdeia I was understood that the 3% was excluded in the calculation.  It does make some sense to discount this percentage ( I personally do not support thresholds but that is another issue).
 
In the absence of a clear indication as to the rules that apply I have published both methods.
 
I again wish to express concern that 22% of voters who supported minor parties have been disenfranchised. Had a system of preferential voting been adopted these voters would have had their vote allocated according to their expressed preference. Under the current system major Party votes are inflated dis-proportionately to the voters choice and intention.
 
This is an issue that Ukraine should seriously review and consideration should be given to adopting a system of preferential voting.  (It would save Ukraine 100's of millions of dollars in direct and indirect costs - in particular with the conduct of the Presidential elections)
 
 
 
Method One.
Seat Allocation (Discounting the 3% threshold)
 
http://www.cvk.gov.ua/vnd2006/w6p001e.html
Source Offical results as of 12:00PM   95% counted
Date March 29, 2006 Poll Date: March 26, 2006
Name of the party or electoral bloc
PR Party of Regions (PR)
BYuT Yuliya Tymoshenko Bloc (BYuT)
NS-NU Bloc 'Our Ukraine' (NS-NU)
SPU Socialist Party of Ukraine (SPU)
KPU Communist Party of Ukraine (KPU)
NVB Nataliya Vitrenko Bloc 'People's Opposition' (NVB)
LPB Lytvyn's People's Bloc (LPB)
VICHE Viche Party
UPBKP Ukrainian People's Bloc of Kostenko and Plyusch
CBP Civil Bloc PORA-PRP' (CBP)
OBNY Oppositional bloc NOT YES! (OBNY)
Party Block Poll% Vote% Seats% No of Seats
PR 31,50% 31,50% 45,43% 204
BYuT 22,40% 22,40% 30,93% 139
NS-NU 14,35% 14,35% 18,09% 81
SPU 5,84% 5,84% 4,53% 20
KPU 3,64% 3,64% 1,02% 5
NVB 2,78% 2,78%  
LPB 2,45% 2,45%  
VICHE 1,68% 1,68%  
UPBKP 1,95% 1,95%  
CBP 1,48% 1,48%  
OBNY 0,98% 0,98%  
Others 10,95% 10,95%  
 
Sum 100,00% 100,00% 100,00% 450
Undecided 0,00%
Balance 0,00%
Summary 100,00%      
 
 
 
Method Two.
Seat Allocation (3% threshold included in allocation)
 
http://www.cvk.gov.ua/vnd2006/w6p001e.html
Source Offical results as of 12:00PM   95% counted
Date March 29, 2006 Poll Date: March 26, 2006
Name of the party or electoral bloc
PR Party of Regions (PR)
BYuT Yuliya Tymoshenko Bloc (BYuT)
NS-NU Bloc 'Our Ukraine' (NS-NU)
SPU Socialist Party of Ukraine (SPU)
KPU Communist Party of Ukraine (KPU)
NVB Nataliya Vitrenko Bloc 'People's Opposition' (NVB)
LPB Lytvyn's People's Bloc (LPB)
VICHE Viche Party
UPBKP Ukrainian People's Bloc of Kostenko and Plyusch
CBP Civil Bloc PORA-PRP' (CBP)
OBNY Oppositional bloc NOT YES! (OBNY)
Party Block Poll% Vote% Seats% No of Seats
PR 31,50% 31,50% 40,52% 182
BYuT 22,40% 22,40% 28,82% 130
NS-NU 14,35% 14,35% 18,46% 83
SPU 5,84% 5,84% 7,51% 34
KPU 3,64% 3,64% 4,68% 21
NVB 2,78% 2,78%  
LPB 2,45% 2,45%  
VICHE 1,68% 1,68%  
UPBKP 1,95% 1,95%  
CBP 1,48% 1,48%  
OBNY 0,98% 0,98%  
Others 10,95% 10,95%  
 
Sum 100,00% 100,00% 100,00% 450
Undecided 0,00%
Balance 0,00%
Summary 100,00%      

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Dissecting the vote: Zakarpattia and Ternopil

By Online Editor -
Two interesting outcomes in the final round vote that have not been widely discussed in the English media is the outcome in Zakarpattia and Ternopil. We are not sure if it has been been discussed in the Ukrainian media 1. Viktor Yanukovych was the highest polling candidate in Zakarpattiia previsoully Our Ukraine/Yushchenko were the highest. (See 2004,2006 and 2007 election results ) District 74 місто Берегове (Beregove - a Hungarian community located near the border) 2. The other interesting observation is that Yanukovych actually went backwards between the first round and the second round in Ternopiil.  In the first round Yanukovych received 6354 (0.26% of the national vote) in the second final round, with less number of candidates, Yanukovych recorded only 5370 (0.21% of the national vote)  Why Yanukovych went backwards in the second round is any ones guess but we think this  would make interesting reading.
<Additional Information>

Averting a Post-Orange Disaster - Andreas Umland

By Online Editor -
"As Ukraine's economic, social and political crisis sharpens, more and more Ukrainians may question the wisdom of conducting a costly presidential election when the Ukrainian state is almost bankrupt--if not on the brink of collapse." Constitutional Reforms and Political Stability in Ukraine by Dr. Andreas Umland Source: Harvard International Review June, 2009 After several years of impressive economic growth and encouraging political change, Ukraine has recently entered troubled waters. The democracies west of Ukraine are institutionally consolidated and internationally embedded enough to circumscribe the political repercussions of their so far relatively mild economic contractions. While being hit almost as hard as Ukraine by the world financial crisis, Russia has managed to build considerable financial reserves thanks to the enormous cash inflow into her state budget during the years of rocketing energy prices, allowing her to soften the social repercussions of the eco
<Additional Information>

History repeats: Victor Yushchenko interferes with Ukraine's judicial process.

By Online Editor -
The Kyiv Administrative court has issued a injunction suspending the Presidents decree dismissing Ukraine's democratically elected parliament. In what is reminiscent of events unfolded last year, Victor Yushchenko has again interfered with the independence of Ukraine's judiciary . In April 2007 the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe ( PACE ) passed a resolution in consideration of a report titled Functioning of democratic institutions in Ukraine . (Items 13 and 14) stated: “The Assembly deplores the fact that the judicial system of Ukraine has been systematically misused by other branches of power and that top officials do not execute the courts’ decisions, which is a sign of erosion of this crucial democratic institution. An independent and impartial judiciary is a precondition for the existence of a democratic society governed by the rule of law." The associated explanatory report under the sub-heading of Pressure on the courts expressed concern that &qu
<Additional Information>